Your review history first
Rex pulls from jobs you've completed and reviewed. Specific scores, specific context. Your institutional memory, not a generic average.
Bid Intelligence
Meet Rex.He's read all the bids.Have you?
Rex is the AI assistant built into your tender page. Before you award, he's already compared the field, flagged what's missing, and pulled the attachment evidence — so your team can decide with a clearer map of the bid field.
How Rex AI works
Stage 1 · Quick scan
Six bids. Three scopes.
Who actually covered it?
Rex scans the full field in under a minute — price outliers, missing responses, budget gaps, and your past reviews with each sub. No attachment deep-dive. No winner pick.
- Average, median and spread across the field, so an outlier is obvious before you open a single PDF.
- One field scan card per company. Scroll the field, and each card opens up into past performance, how their price stacks up, and the notes to raise before you call them.
- Hit Dig Deeper on any company and Rex moves that one to Stage 2.
Where Rex lands: a map of the field. Not a recommendation.
How I'm reading this job
Deep dives 1 of 3What I'm SeeingUpdatedWilliams AI ChecksField Flags you should knowYour Bid ExpectationsPerformanceNext Actions
What I'm Seeing
UpdatedBids:Avg $680,360Median $682,700Spread $114,820
Diamond Landscape Construction Inc. came in the tightest at $621,780 while Chevron Utilities Inc. is the highest bid at $736,600.
Direction is still pointing the same way after 1 of 3 deep dives completed; Paragon has not yet been reviewed.
The evidence so far still points toward Diamond Landscape Construction Inc. as the candidate to examine first, based on lowest price at $621,780 and all unit rates under budget targets. The completed deep dive on Chevron Utilities Inc. confirms their $736,600 bid is complete and well documented, but the 19.8% premium over budget is real and consistent across all line items.
Stage 1
Analysis
My field scan of each company, one card at a time. These stay as I first read them. Hit Dig Deeper on any of them to run Stage 2, and your deep dives sit below.
2 of 3
Paragon Construction Ltd.
Bid amount$736,600
Scope Alignment: High
My Read
Strong reliability history and a complete bid, but the price carries a meaningful margin over your budget on every line.
Past Performance Snapshot
Bid amount$682,700
Scope Alignment: Medium
Dig Deeper with Rex
My Read
This is what I'm seeing here: mid-field price, complete bid, but very limited review history makes it hard to assess execution confidence on an FDOT corridor job.
Risk signal worth a closer look: Moderate. Check the Before You Call notes for the key clarification points.
Past Performance Snapshot
How their price stacks up to the rest
Price Competitiveness
Before You Call
Bid amount$621,780
Scope Alignment: Medium
My Read
Lowest in the field and under your budget targets, but the blank equipment response suggests scope gaps worth raising.
Past Performance Snapshot
Always updating. Those summary tabs at the top, What I'm Seeing, Your Bid Expectations, Next Actions and the rest, don't sit still. Every deep dive you run feeds back into them, and anything Rex rewrites gets marked Updated so your team can see what changed.
Stage 2 · Deep dive
Lowest number looks clean.
Is it?
Dig into one bidder. Rex reads the attachments, checks scope alignment, and pulls your history with them — conditions buried on page four included.
- Tells you what it actually read: how many attachments, how many past jobs, how many of your own reviews.
- Splits the read into scope alignment, reliability and commercial signal, so you can go straight to the part you care about.
- Ends on a final take that lays out the trade-off and then hands the call back to you.
Where Rex lands: evidence. Still your call.
Stage 2
Analysis
Now I'm digging deep on each company, going through their past performance, bid details, attachments, and anything else I can get my hands on. Pick a company below to see what I found.
Chevron Utilities Inc.Paragon Construction Ltd.Diamond Landscape Construction Inc.
Viewing Chevron Utilities Inc.Updated 2d ago
Similar jobs: 6Your reviews: 19Attachments (bidder/poster): 1/1
Reviewed readable text from 1 bidder and 1 poster attachments. 0 were unreadable/unsupported. 0 readable files were skipped by per-run limits.
Deep Dive Summary
Additional context from attachments
Additional context from past jobs
Scope Alignment
All four quoted items map directly to the tender requirements: FDOT Type F curb and gutter at 9,200 LF, concrete sidewalk at 42,000 SF, 24 ADA ramps with detectable warning panels included in the unit price, and a lump-sum mobilization.
The only exclusion noted is premium time unless directed by Williams. That is a standard carve-out but worth keeping in mind if the schedule compresses.
Scope Alignment: High
Reliability Signal
Commercial Signal
What you could do next
My final take...
Chevron is the most complete submission in the field and the scope alignment is clean. The price is above both the field average and your budget, with mobilization being the least explained line. The safety observation from a prior job is a conversation to have, not a disqualifier.
The decision on whether the execution profile justifies the premium over the field is yours. Message me in the chat if you want to work through the comparison against the other bidders.
Rex is for analysis only, all decisions are yours.
Rex maps the field. You award the job.
AI Checks
Tell Rex what you want him to review.
Every shop has its own scar tissue. The exclusion a sub buried that turned into a change order. The quote that showed up without taxes. The scope gap your trade always gets caught on. AI Checks are standing questions your company sets once, and Rex answers them on every job, in their own tab, one answer per check.
- Set once, answered every time. Your checks ride along on every job, so nobody has to remember to ask.
- Field-wide or document-deep. Point a check at the whole bid field, or at one bidder's documents during a deep dive.
- Answers keep pace. A field-wide check gets revisited after every deep dive. If a document changes the answer, Rex updates it and marks it changed instead of leaving a stale read on the page.
- On top of the analysis, not instead of it. Rex writes the analysis first, then answers your checks against it. A check can't quietly reshape the findings your team relies on, and the usual limits still hold: no naming a winner, no leaving out evidence it found.
Company administrators own the list, since these shape the analysis the whole team reads. How AI Checks work
What I'm SeeingWilliams AI ChecksField Flags you should knowYour Bid ExpectationsPerformanceNext Actions
Williams' AI Checks
Standing questions your company administrators set in Settings under Rex AI. I answer each one separately, and I answer them after the analysis above is written, so a check cannot bend my other findings. A deep dive has changed at least one answer below.
Field scan checks
Answered across the whole field, then revisited after each deep dive in case a document changes the answer.
Does every bid include applicable taxes in the total?
AnsweredFour of five confirm taxes are in the total. Bidder D shows tax excluded on the equipment line, so their number is not comparable to the rest as submitted.
Flag any bid that excludes traffic control.
UpdatedAnsweredBidder B answered "included" on the bid form, but their conditions letter excludes lane closures after hours. That is a change from my earlier answer, which read the bid form only.
Has anyone capped their liability below our contract minimum?
Needs a deep diveNothing in the bid responses settles this. Caps like this live in the terms attachment, and Bidders A, C, D and E have not been deep dived yet.
Deep dive checks
These read attachments, so I answer them once per company you deep dive. 1 of 5 bidders done so far.
Confirm dewatering sits with the sub, not us.
Bidder B
Their scope letter puts dewatering with the general contractor, not with them. Priced accordingly, so the exclusion is real.
AnsweredFour bidders still to go. Run a deep dive and I will answer this against their documents too.
Chat with Rex
Follow up on anything.
Rex stays in the tender page. Once Stage 1 is done, your team can ask him about a specific bid, a price gap, a scope concern, or a field flag. He answers from the same analysis — not from scratch.
- Remembers every Stage 1 and Stage 2 finding for this tender
- Answers from evidence. Won't guess when data is missing.
- Stays scoped to the job. Construction talk only.
- Won't pick a winner. Will tell you everything you need to decide.
Talk to RexAI
Live tender contextWhy is Bidder C so much lower than the others?
Rex
Bidder C came in 22% below field median, but they've excluded mobilization and left the equipment requirement response blank. After leveling, the gap closes to about 8%. Worth confirming what's actually in scope before that number does any heavy lifting.
Have we used them before?
Rex
You have one completed job with them on record, rated 3.6 / 5. Timeliness and scope alignment both scored low. No published market reviews available. Not a red flag on its own — but I wouldn't let price carry the decision when the history is that thin.
Performance memory
Price is the start of the conversation.
Rex puts price in context, then checks the rest. Your own review history, market context where it exists, and what the attachments actually say. Award the job on the full picture.
Market context, kept anonymous
Published reviews from other companies round out the picture. Aggregate themes and scores only. Rex never names a job or client that isn't yours to name.
Honest when history is thin
If Rex doesn't have enough to form a view, he says so. Fabricated confidence is worse than a gap. You'll know when the signal is limited.
Rex is already in your tender page.
The analysis starts the moment your team opens a bid. No setup. No separate tool. Hit Run Analysis and let Rex read the field.
Rex is for analysis only - all decisions are yours.