Your review history first
Rex pulls from jobs you've completed and reviewed. Specific scores, specific context. Your institutional memory, not a generic average.
Bid Intelligence
Meet Rex.He's read all the bids.Have you?
Rex is the AI assistant built into your tender page. Before you award, he's already compared the field, flagged what's missing, and pulled the attachment evidence — so your team can decide with a clearer map of the bid field.
The Process
Fast read first.
Deep evidence second.
Built for the moment you're staring at a bid tab with too many PDFs and not enough time.
Stage 1 · Quick scan
Six bids. Three scopes.
Who actually covered it?
Rex scans the full field in under a minute — price outliers, missing responses, budget gaps, and your past reviews with each sub. No attachment deep-dive. No winner pick.
Where Rex lands: a map of the field. Not a recommendation.
Stage 2 · Deep dive
Lowest number looks clean.
Is it?
Dig into one bidder. Rex reads the attachments, checks scope alignment, and pulls your history with them — conditions buried on page four included.
Where Rex lands: evidence. Still your call.
Rex maps the field. You award the job.
Chat with Rex
Follow up on anything.
Rex stays in the tender page. Once Stage 1 is done, your team can ask him about a specific bid, a price gap, a scope concern, or a field flag. He answers from the same analysis — not from scratch.
- Remembers every Stage 1 and Stage 2 finding for this tender
- Answers from evidence. Won't guess when data is missing.
- Stays scoped to the job. Construction talk only.
- Won't pick a winner. Will tell you everything you need to decide.
Talk to RexAI
Live tender contextWhy is Bidder C so much lower than the others?
Rex
Bidder C came in 22% below field median, but they've excluded mobilization and left the equipment requirement response blank. After leveling, the gap closes to about 8%. Worth confirming what's actually in scope before that number does any heavy lifting.
Have we used them before?
Rex
You have one completed job with them on record, rated 3.6 / 5. Timeliness and scope alignment both scored low. No published market reviews available. Not a red flag on its own — but I wouldn't let price carry the decision when the history is that thin.
Performance memory
Price is the start of the conversation.
Rex puts price in context, then checks the rest. Your own review history, market context where it exists, and what the attachments actually say. Award the job on the full picture.
Market context, kept anonymous
Published reviews from other companies round out the picture. Aggregate themes and scores only. Rex never names a job or client that isn't yours to name.
Honest when history is thin
If Rex doesn't have enough to form a view, he says so. Fabricated confidence is worse than a gap. You'll know when the signal is limited.
Rex is already in your tender page.
The analysis starts the moment your team opens a bid. No setup. No separate tool. Hit Run Analysis and let Rex read the field.
Rex is for analysis only - all decisions are yours.