Six bids. Three scopes. Who actually covered everything?
Rex reads every response and surfaces where the field splits before you do.
Bid Intelligence
Meet Rex.He's read all the bids.Have you?
Rex is the AI assistant built into your tender page. Before you award, he's already compared the field, flagged what's missing, pulled the attachment evidence, and told you who he'd be watching closely and why.
What Rex fixes
Lowest bid looks clean. Is it?
Rex checks completeness, exclusions, and leveling before he leans on price.
You've worked with them before. How'd that actually go?
Rex surfaces your own review history alongside market context. Not gut feel.
Attachments sitting unread. Conditions buried on page 4.
Rex extracts and compares attachment evidence, then ties it back to award risk.
The Process
Fast read first. Deep evidence second.
Rex runs in two modes. A field scan across all bids, then a full evidence review on whoever you're watching closely. You decide when to go deeper.
Stage 1 - Quick scan
Rex reads the field
A fast, structured read of every bid so your team knows where the real decisions are before the detailed work starts.
- Bid totals in context: average, median, spread, outliers flagged
- Completeness check on every bid response
- Missing requirement gaps surfaced across the field
- Rex's provisional lean, price-weighted and openly provisional
- Next actions only when a recurring gap actually warrants one
What Stage 1 produces
- My pick so far. Rex's provisional lean to start the discussion, not end it
- Summary. Bid math and where the field separates
- Bidder sections. Each company broken down on its own terms
- Field flags. Cross-bid issues that could change award quality
- Next actions. Only when a real recurring gap warrants one
- Missing review prompts. Where confidence is limited and follow-up helps
Stage 2 - Deep dive
One bidder. All the evidence.
When the decision is tight, Rex goes in. Scope alignment, attachment review, commercial signals, and your own job history with that sub. All in one read.
- Scope alignment against the tender requirements
- Attachment extraction: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, drawings
- Commercial signals beyond the raw bid number
- Past jobs from your own review history with that company
- Confirms or challenges your Stage 1 lean with actual evidence
When to run a deep dive
- The decision is tight between two bidders and price alone doesn't settle it
- Stage 1 flagged a risk that needs attachment-level evidence to confirm
- A bidder's history is thin and you need to know what the documents actually say
- Your team is split and needs a structured read to align on
Chat with Rex
Follow up on anything.
Rex stays in the tender page. Once Stage 1 is done, your team can ask him anything about a specific bid, a price gap, a scope concern, or why he leans the way he does. He answers from the same analysis, not from scratch.
- Remembers every Stage 1 and Stage 2 finding for this tender
- Answers from evidence. Won't guess when data is missing.
- Stays scoped to the job. Construction talk only.
- Won't pick a winner. Will tell you everything you need to decide.
Talk to RexAI
Live tender contextWhy is Bidder C so much lower than the others?
Rex
Bidder C came in 22% below field median, but they've excluded mobilization and left the equipment requirement response blank. After leveling, the gap closes to about 8%. Worth confirming what's actually in scope before that number does any heavy lifting.
Have we used them before?
Rex
You have one completed job with them on record, rated 3.6 / 5. Timeliness and scope alignment both scored low. No published market reviews available. Not a red flag on its own, but I wouldn't build your lean around price when the history is that thin.
Performance memory
Price is the start of the conversation.
Rex weights price first, then checks the rest. Your own review history, market context where it exists, and what the attachments actually say. Award the job on the full picture.
Your review history first
Rex pulls from jobs you've completed and reviewed. Specific scores, specific context. Your institutional memory, not a generic average.
Market context, kept anonymous
Published reviews from other companies round out the picture. Aggregate themes and scores only. Rex never names a job or client that isn't yours to name.
Honest when history is thin
If Rex doesn't have enough to form a view, he says so. Fabricated confidence is worse than a gap. You'll know when the signal is limited.
Rex is already in your tender page.
The analysis starts the moment your team opens a bid. No setup. No separate tool. Hit Run Analysis and let Rex read the field.
Rex is for analysis only - all decisions are yours.